It's not Flamur Noka's fault!

I'm seeing people posting a video where Flamur Noka argues with a democratic activist and at one point, he tells her to go away, pointing to the door.
It is not Flamur's fault. He, Flamur Noka, is the symbol of all the DP militants, their image; he is them, embodied in a single body, in the body of Flamur.
Didn't the PD militants rise up, showing the door to every democrat who didn't think like them? Yes, they did. Aren't the PD militants arrogant and arrogant? Yes, they are. Don't the PD militants think that everything is solved by force, by throwing bottles, crowbars and even anti-tank guns? Yes, that's what they think and dream about. Don't the PD militants think that loyalty to Sali Berisha as a person is the only dignified stance in politics and in life, otherwise you are a traitor and a sellout? Yes, that's what they think. All these qualities, behaviors and beliefs of the militants are summarized and represented by Flamur Noka. So Flamur is them, like them, one of them. Flamur is naturally the PD.
On the other hand and in parallel, Flamur, without even realizing it himself, is part of an exercise in psychoanalysis on the part of Sali Berisha. He, Sali Berisha, through Flamur manages two relationships; the relationship with his militant, giving the militants as a release valve by calling him guilty, as well as the relationship with non-militant. Flamur is therefore Sali Berisha's multifaceted decision for others.
The flag is the opportunity for those democrats who do not have the courage and manliness to face the problem head on, to have the flag as a shooting target to vent their frustration because they do not have the courage to deal with the leader. Sali Berisha has given his militants a culprit, the flag. Even the space he has left for the flag to make some decisions on his own is within the framework of this psychoanalytic operation by Doctor Saliu to create the figure of the culprit for the disasters of the DP. And in creating the figure of the culprit, the flag itself must also contribute, to make the figure of the culprit as credible as possible. Sholzhenitsyn writes that Stalin did not give direct orders for torture. And how did the tortures happen? Stalin, he writes, had appointed to key positions in the NKVD, people who did not know how to do anything other than torture, therefore he did not need to bother giving orders, since they did the tortures themselves.
On the other hand, in parallel, Flamur is Sali Berisha's cynicism towards all those who have a political opinion and call themselves smart. They are forced to meet and talk to him, they have to talk to the militant promoted to the highest position. Someone understands and manages him, someone does not understand. But that's how it is.
This is Sali Berisha's Dostoevsky cynicism and is a form of exercising his party power in the most brutal way; Berisha tells you I have 20 thousand militants and 500 thousand votes, therefore I force you to deal with my militant who has no duty to think politically. Either agree to discuss at the militant level as an act of your submission to me, or go ahead, run away.
There is no way that Sali Berisha can be good, while those under him are bad, it cannot be like that. Either these are bad and Sali Berisha is like them, or Sali Berisha is good and these are like Sali Berisha. People with different characters and different cultures cannot cooperate so closely and so harmoniously.
So don't mess with Flamur Noka. Flamur is the character through which the great writer Sali Berisha, author of the novel "Free Vote", communicates with other people. You who are not dealing with the writer, but are dealing with the character, are simply within what the writer has foreseen for you, you are behaving like characters in the book.
Happening now...
Karmën nuk e ndalon dot Sali Berisha!
ideas
"Topple" Edi Rama by lying to yourself...
Only accepting Berisha's truths will save the DP from final extinction!
top
Alfa recipes
TRENDING 
services
- POLICE129
- STREET POLICE126
- AMBULANCE112
- FIREFIGHTER128
