Why should we impose ourselves on a leadership?

2025-05-26 14:54:36 / IDE NGA ALBAN DACI

Why should we impose ourselves on a leadership?

Why should we impose ourselves on a leadership that took over the party with the pretense of reforming it and in fact did nothing except reconfirm it?
Why should we impose ourselves on a leadership that did not make any attempt for open lists, but entered the elections with closed lists defending the status quo?
Why should we impose ourselves on a leadership that approves this Electoral Code by giving the "bonus" to the Government that has donated more than 13 mandates to the table that do not reflect representation in a fair ratio with the voters?
Why should we impose ourselves on a leadership that took over the party on the pretext that the predecessor could not do it and that they would overthrow it in 6 months and in fact it did not happen?
Why should we impose ourselves on a leadership that said that they would defeat Rama with "Civil Disobedience" and would take over the technical government and it did not happen?
Why should we impose ourselves on a leadership that accused the predecessor of being a traitor and a collaborator with Rama, when in fact they made Amnesty with the latter and approved the Electoral Code?
Why should we impose ourselves on a leadership that, in order to fight its predecessor, introduced the "Basha Article" into the Statute that whoever loses the elections resigns and leaves, and in fact it is not happening?
Why should we impose ourselves on a leadership that took over the Party with the idea that they would hold large and fierce protests and according to them, unlike the predecessor who "turned them off", in fact the participation in the protests is increasingly smaller?
Why should we impose ourselves on a leadership that said we would take over the DP and we would not enter the elections with Rama and in fact they entered and lost!
Why should we impose ourselves on a leadership that took over the party with the guarantee that it would protect the vote of the citizens and today the main cause of the loss of the elections is precisely the fact that: "Rama stole the elections"?
The issue of leadership is no longer a mechanism neither statutory nor democratic, but an imposition through the balance of forces, proving that they will keep the party above all else, because they can do it?
Since there is no longer any logic, statutes or reality, then it is useless to try to find a solution within that subject, since the latter is no longer considered a voluntary grouping, but almost a private property with rights only for those who possess it.
Politics is not a monopoly and cannot be the exclusive right of only a few! Everyone has the right to enter active politics and make their political offer. There are no traitors in politics, but there are politicians!

Happening now...

ideas